Bibliografie
Adler, Jerry. “Freud in Our Midst”. Newsweek, 27/03/06.
Bayle, Gérard. “Au-delà du Livre noir de la psychanalyse”, No Pasaran, N°50, 2006.
Bernat-Winter, Harold. “(anti)ª : à propos de L'anti livre noir de la psychanalyse” .
http://bernat.blog.lemonde.fr/bernat/2006/04/anti_ou_la_crit.html
Berthou, Elisabeth. “Un ‘Livre noir’ critique et… critiqué”. Courrier International, 15/11/2005.
Bloom, Harold. “Freud, The Greatest Modern Writer”. New York Review of Books, March 23, 1986.
Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel. “How fabrications differ from a lie” [review van Han Israëls. Der Fall Freud]”. Londen
Review of Book, Vol. 22, No. 8, 13 April 2000, zoals te vinden op http://www.lrb.co.uk/v22/n08/borc01_.html
(26/04/2006).
Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel. Folies à plusieurs. Le psychanalyste en caméléon. Paris: Le Seuil. 2002.
Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel; Shamdasani, Sonu. Le Dossier Freud. Enquête sur l’Histoire de la Psychanalyse. Paris: Les
empêcheurs de penser en rond / Le Seuil. 2006.
Boxer, Sarah. “Flogging Freud”. The New York Times, August 10, 1997.
Brooks, Peter; Woloch, Alex (Eds.). Whose Freud? The Place of Psychoanalysis in Contemporray Culture. New
Haven and London: Yale University Press. 2000
Buekens, Filip. Freuds Vergissing. Over de Illusies van de Psychoanalyse. Leuven: Van halewyck. (voorzien voor
eind 2006)
Buekens, Filip. Jacques Lacan. Proefvlucht in het luchtledige. Leuven: Acco. 2006.
Callaway, Enoch. “Psychiatry today (Informed Opinion)”. The Western Journal of Medicine,122:349-354, Apr 1975.
Carroll, Robert T. Becoming a Critical Thinker: A Guide for the New Millennium. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
2000.
Charles, Gilbert. “Et si la science donnait raison à Freud?”. L'Express, 11/05/2006.
Chertok, Léon; Stengers, Isabelle. La coeur et la raison. L’hypnose en question, de Lavoisier à Lacan. Paris: Éditions
Payot. 1989
Cioffi, Frank. “The Rationale for Psychoanalytic Interpretation”. Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 12, Issue 3, 2001, p. 161-
175.
Cioffi, Frank. Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. Chicago, IL: Open Court. 1998.
Cioffi, Frank. Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
Cochez, Tom. “Kwaliteitslabel moet kwakzalvers van therapeuten onderscheiden”. De Morgen, 24/09/2005.
Crews, Frederick (Ed.). Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront a Legend. New York: Viking Penguin. 1998.
Crews, Frederick. “The Verdict on Freud”. In: Psychological Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, March 1996.
Crews, Frederick. [inleiding op “A Zero Theory” van Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen],
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=155
Crews, Frederick. “Reply to ‘The Shrink is In’ by Jonathan Lear”. http://human-nature.com/articles/crews.html
Crews, Frederick. Skeptical Engagements. New Zealand: Cybereditions. 2000.
Crews, Frederick. The Memory Wars: Freud's Legacy in Dispute. New York: New York Review of Books Reprint
Edition. 1997.
De Bellefroid, Éric. “L'honneur vengé de Freud”. La Libre Belgique, 03/03/2006.
De Block, Andreas; Moyaert, Paul (red.). Oneigenlijk gebruik. De psychoanalyse voorbij haar grenzen. Kapellen:
Pelckmans. 2004.
De Ceulaer, Joël. “Freud est mort”. Knack 47, 2005, pp. 52-56.
De Gendt, Tina. “Wat is angst?” [interview met Lieven Jonckheere]. De Morgen, 11/03/2006.
Decuyper, Peter. “De plaats van de psychoanalyse in de samenleving en de cultuur”. Skripta 3, 2005, p. 85-87.
Demuynck, Joost. “Freud is dood, Leve Freud!”. Skripta 3, 2005, p. 99-103.
Demuynck, Joost. “Toch iets meer licht graag! Over kwakzalvers, psychofarmaca, diploma's, evaluatie”,
http://www.forumpsy.org/be/Demuynck.deel%20een.htm
Derksen, Anthony A. “The Seven Sins Of Pseudo-Science”. In: Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 24,
1993, No. 1, S. 17-42.
Derksen, Anthony A. “The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: a look into Freud's rhetorical tool
box”. In: Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol 32, 2001, No. 2, S. 329-350.
Derrida, Jacques. Resistances of Psychoanalysis. California: Stanford University Press. 1998.
Domhoff, G. W. (2001). “Why did empirical dream researchers reject Freud? A critique of historical claims by Mark
Solms.” Dreaming, 14, 3-17.
Dufresne, Todd. “Sigmund Freud: Savant and Charlatan”. The Semiotic Review of Books, Volume 11.1 (2000).
Duplat, Guy. “Le «scandale» de Freud. Guy Deplat rencontre Jean Laplanche”. La Libre Belgique, 02-02-2006.
Eagle, Morris. “A Critique of the Postmodern Turn in Psychoanalysis” [Paper presented on June 10, 2000, at the
Annual Meeting of the Rapaport-Klein Group]. Een latere versie verscheen in Journal of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, 2001, 49, 2:457-89.
Edmundson, Mark. “Why Democracy Needs Freud”. The New York Times, August 16, 1998.
Erwin, Edward (ed.). The Freud Encyclopedia: Theory, Therapy, and Culture. New York: Routledge. 2002.
Esterson, Allen. “A Seductive Story”. 2006, http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=195
Farrell, John. Freud's Paranoid Quest. Psychoanalysis and Modern Suspicion. New York: New York University Press.
1996.
Forrester, John. Dispatches from the Freud wars: Psychoanalysis and its Passions. Cambridge, MA, and London:
Harvard University Press. 1997.
Freud, Sigmund. “De Weerstanden tegen de Psychoanalyse”. In: De Psychoanalytische Beweging 2. Vertaald door
Thomas Graftdijk. Amsterdam: Boom Meppel. 1991.
Freud, Sigmund. “The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement”. In: Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series
(No. 25). New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Pub. Co. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Freud/History/index.htm
Freud, Sigmund. De Draagbare Freud. Amsterdam: Ooievaar. 1999.
Freud, Sigmund. De Droomduiding. Vertaald door Thomas Graftdijk. Amsterdam: Boom Meppel. 1987.
Galatzer-Levy, Robert M. [Review of ‘Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis’ by Adolf Grünbaum]
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 44, 1996, pp. 594-599.
Gauthier, Ursula. “Faut-il en finir avec la psychanalyse?”. Le Nouvel Observateur, 01/09/06.
Gellner, Ernest. The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason. London: Paladin. 1985.
Gillett, Eric. “Relativism and the Social-constructivist Paradigm". In: Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, Vol. 5,
Nr. 1, March 1998, pp. 37-48.
Grünbaum, Adolf. Agassi-Grünbaum Exchange on Popper and Psychoanalysis.
http://www.eeng.dcu.ie/~tkpw/newsletter/v4n1-2/node10.html
Grünbaum, Adolf. The foundations of psychoanalysis: a philosophical critique Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1984.
Gutierrez, Ricardo. “Les psys ne sont pas nuls”. Le Soir 24/09/2005
Holland, Norman. “Psychoanalysis as Science” PsyArt: A Hyperlink Journal for the Psychological Study of the Arts,
article 042205. http://www.clas.ufl.edu/ipsa/journal/2004_holland08.shtml, (14/03/2006)
Horgan, John. Freud Is Niet Dood. Het Blijvend Raadsel van het Menselijk Brein. Amsterdam: Ambo, 2000
Hulspas, Marcel. “Wetenschappelijke Pornografie. De obsessies van de Psychoanalyse”. Skepter 13(2), 2000
Israëls, Han. De Weense Kwakzalver: honderd jaar Freud en de Freudianen, Bert Bakker, Amsterdam, 1999
Jacobs, Melissa. “Freud is Dead, Long Live Freud”, The Observing Ego, 16/04/2005.
Jonckheere, Lieven. “Freud, knack en de reglementering van de psychotherapie in België.” Skripta. Editie 3, 2005, p.
9598
Jonckheere, Lieven. Evaluatie, Tussen de Scylla van de Controle en de Charybdis van de Groei, [Jan Van Eyck Circle
for Lacanian Ideology Critique, Round Table: On the place of lacanian psychoanalysis in current political and
cultural theory, Maastricht, 21/02/2004] http://www.forumpsy.org/be/Lieven%20Jonckheere1.htm
Kandel, E.R. “Biology and the future of psychoanalysis : a new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited”,
American Journal of Psychiatry, 1999, 156 : 505-524
Kavanaugh, P. B. Is Psychoanalysis In Crisis: It All Depends On The Premise Of Your Analysis. Paper presented at the
American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Toronto, 1996
Kihlstrom, John F. “The cognitive unconscious.” Science 237:1445-1452, 1987
Kirsner, Douglas. “Life Among The Analysts”, Free Associations 1999, 7: 416-36
Lear, Jonathan. [Review of ‘The Memory Wars’ by Frederick Crews] Journal of the American Psychoanalytic
Association 44, 1996, pp. 580-587
Lear, Jonathan. “The Shrink is In: A Counterblast in the War on Freud”, New Republic 25/12/1995, p. 18-25
Leys, Ruth. [Review of ‘Freud Evaluated’ by Malcolm Macmillan]. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 66. 673-674,
1992
Luborsky, Lester; Barrett, Marna S. The History and Empirical Status of Key Psychoanalytic Concepts, Annual
Review Clinical Psychology. 2006. 2:1–19
Macmillan, Malcolm. “The Reliability and Validity of Freud’s Methods of Free Association and Interpretation”
Psychological Inquiry Vol.12 Issue 3, p. 167-176
Macmillan, Malcolm. Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997
McNally, Richard J. “Is the Pseudoscience Concept Useful for Clinical Psychology. The Demise of Pseudoscience”.
The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice Fall/Winter 2003 Volume 2 Number 2,
http://www.srmhp.org/0202/pseudoscience.html#notes
Merkin, Daphne. “Secrets of the Soul: Is Psychoanalysis Science or Is It Toast?”, The New York Times, 5/9/2004
Meyer, Catherine; Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel; Cottraux, Jean; Pleux, Didier; Van Rillaer, Jacques (red.) Le Livre Noir de
la Psychanalyse. Vivre, Penser et Aller Mieux Sans Freud. Paris: les Arènes, 2005
Michels, Robert. [Review of ‘The Memory Wars’ by Frederick Crews] Journal of the American Psychoanalytic
Association 44, 1996, pp. 573-579
Miller, Jacques-Alain (red.). L'Anti-livre noir de la psychanalyse, Seuil, 2006
Miller, Jacques-Alain. [interview] Le Point, n°1723, 29/09/2005.
Mitchell, Stephen A. Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis, 1997. Hoofdstuk 7, “The analyst’s knowledge and
authority”, pp. 203-230, http://www.dspp.com/papers/mitchell4.htm.
Mooij, Antoine. Psychoanalytische Gedachtegoed. Amsterdam: Boom, 2002
Nagel, Thomas. “Freud's Permanent Revolution” The New York Review of Books 12/05/1994 (An Exchange: 11/08/1994)
Nouvel Observateur. [correspondentie over het artikel “Faut-il en finir avec la psychanalyse?” van Ursula Gauthier], 2005,
http://archquo.nouvelobs.com/cgi/articles?ad=culture/20050916.OBS9405.h…
s.com/&culture/20050916.OBS9405.html
Pelc, Isidore et al. Psychotherapieën: Definities, Praktijk, Erkenningsvoorwaarden. (Advies van de Hoge
Gezondheidsraad) 2005
Popper, Karl. “Replies to My Critics”in: Schilpp, P.A., The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, LaSalle, Ill, 1974
Popper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul,
1969
Paul. Freud and His Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
Robinson,
http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft4w10062x/
Roth, Michael S. (Ed.) Freud. Conflict and Culture New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998
Roudinesco, Elisabeth. Pourquoi la Psychanalyse? Paris: Fayard, 1999
Roudinesco, Elisabeth. Pourquoi tant de haine ? Anatomie du Livre noir de la psychanalyse, Navarin, 2005
Sauret Marie-Jean. “Pourquoi les psychanalystes n’arrêtent pas de citer Freud ou Lacan?”, 2006.
http://www.squiggle.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=250&It…
Sibony, Daniel. “En finir avec la psychanalyse?” Libération 13/9/05.
Smith, Dinitia. “Freud May Be Dead, But His Critics Still Kick”, The New York Times 10/12/1995
Solms, Mark. “Freud Returns”, Scientific American Vol. 290, 2004, pp. 82-88
Tallis, Raymond C. “Burying Freud”, The Lancet, 09/03/1996
Van Hoorde, Hubert. “Recht van antwoord naar aanleiding van “Freud est mort””. Skripta, Editie 3, 2005, p. 89-93
Verhaeghe, Paul. “Het Bankroet van de Vaders en de Echte Vragen”, De Morgen, 10/12/1999
Verhaeghe, Paul. Klinische Psychodiagnostiek vanuit de Discourstheorie: impasses en antwoorden, Idesça, Gent,
1995.
Webster, Richard. “The bewildered visionary”, Times Literary Supplement 16/06/1997
Webster, Richard. Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science and Psychoanalysis London: Harper Collins, 1995.
Westen, Drew. “The scientific status of unconscious processes: is Freud really dead?” in Journal of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, 1999, 47, 4: 1061-1106 http://www.psychomedia.it/rapaport-klein/westen99.htm
Wilcocks, Robert. French Connection III. A Black or, rather, a Grey Book in the Fall.
www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=150
Williams, Paul. “It’s All in the Mind”, The Sunday Times, 26/06/1994
Williams, Paul. human-nature.com/freud/williams.html, ook in Anthony Molino, Christine Ware (Eds.), Where Id
Was: Challenging Normalization in Psychoanalysis, Wesleyan University Press, 2002
Wilson, Stephen. Introducing the Freud Wars, Totem Books, 2003
Žižek, Slavoj. Looking Awry. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991.
Zwettler-Otte, Sylvia. “A Conversation with Sylvia Zwettler-Otte”, Logos 5.1, 2006,
http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_5.1/zwettler.htm