Staal zonder schoorsteenpluim: hoe koud en heet CO₂ uit hoogovengas halen

Gunel
Rahimli

Stel je een staalfabriek voor. Dag en nacht walmt er een hoogoven, de grootste CO₂-bron van de hele site. Toch is die rook een vervelend raadsel voor wie CO₂ wil afvangen: het gas bevat maar een klein deel CO₂, de rest is vooral stikstof. Het is alsof je een paar druppels inkt uit een emmer water wilt filteren. Dat kost veel energie en dus veel geld.

 

In mijn masterthesis zocht ik een manier om dat probleem om te draaien. Wat als je de inkt eerst concentreert, en pas daarna filtert?

 

Een omweg via ijzer

 

Het idee komt van H2Loop, een proces van Rouge H2 Engineering, het bedrijf waar ik mijn onderzoek uitvoerde, samen met de TU Bergakademie Freiberg. Het hoogovengas wordt over ijzeroxide geleid. Dat haalt zuurstof uit de brandbare bestanddelen van het gas, koolmonoxide en waterstof, en wordt zo gereduceerd. Daarna blaast men stoom over het ijzer, dat zijn zuurstof terugneemt en daarbij waterstof vrijgeeft.

 

Het resultaat is dubbel. Je krijgt schone waterstof als bijproduct. En je houdt een gasstroom over met ongeveer 40 procent CO₂, een stuk meer dan in het oorspronkelijke gas. Daarmee verandert de vraag: welke techniek haalt die CO₂ er het best en het goedkoopst uit?

 

Zes kandidaten, twee finalisten

 

Ik begon met een uitgebreid literatuuronderzoek. Aminewassing, de techniek die vandaag het vaakst gebruikt wordt, werkt goed bij verdunde rookgassen en kost volgens de literatuur ongeveer 100 tot 115 euro per ton vermeden CO₂. Membranen zijn modulair en veelbelovend. Ook fysische absorptie en adsorptie kwamen aan bod. Voor een gasstroom die al rijk aan CO₂ is, bleven er twee kandidaten over.

 

De eerste is cryogene scheiding. Daarbij wordt het gas samengeperst en tot ongeveer min 95 graden afgekoeld, tot de CO₂ vloeibaar wordt en kan worden afgescheiden. De tweede is calciumlooping. Daarbij bindt kalk, bij ongeveer 650 graden, de CO₂ chemisch. In een tweede reactor, op 900 graden, laat de kalk de CO₂ weer los, zodat je een zuivere stroom krijgt.

 

Twee fabrieken in de computer

 

Geen van beide technieken bestond al in combinatie met H2Loop. Ik bouwde daarom voor allebei een volledig model in het simulatieprogramma Aspen Plus, voor een installatie die 1.000 kubieke meter hoogovengas per uur verwerkt. Beide modellen vertrekken van exact dezelfde voorbehandeling, zodat de vergelijking eerlijk is: verschillen in kost of prestatie komen dan echt van de scheidingstechniek en niet van het gas dat erin gaat. Met warmte-integratie liet ik de installaties zoveel mogelijk hun eigen restwarmte hergebruiken.

 

Vervolgens rekende ik uit wat elke installatie zou kosten om te bouwen en te laten draaien. Ik hield rekening met investeringen, onderhoud, personeel, elektriciteit en de Europese CO₂-prijs, en berekende zo de kost per ton opgevangen CO₂.

 

Beide werken, maar één is goedkoper

 

Technisch halen beide routes ruim de doelstellingen van meer dan 95 procent zuiverheid en 90 procent afvang. De cryogene installatie levert vloeibare CO₂ met een zuiverheid van 99,9 procent en vangt 95 procent van de CO₂ op die ze krijgt. Calciumlooping scoort 97,6 procent afvang en een bijna zuiver eindproduct. Telt men ook het koolstof mee dat als onverbrande koolmonoxide de installatie verlaat, dan komt de afvang van de hele installatie uit op ongeveer 85 procent voor cryogeen en 93 procent voor calciumlooping.

 

Het verschil zit in de rekening. Cryogene scheiding kost ongeveer 351 euro per ton CO₂, calciumlooping ongeveer 393 euro. De reden is de energie. Cryogeen vraagt vooral stroom voor compressoren en koeling, ongeveer 1,24 megawattuur per ton CO₂. Bij calciumlooping moet de kalk op 900 graden worden verhit om de CO₂ vrij te maken, en als dat elektrisch gebeurt, verbruikt de calciner alleen al ongeveer 71 procent van alle stroom in de installatie. In totaal gaat het om 1,88 megawattuur per ton CO₂.

 

Pas rendabel op grote schaal

 

Op deze proefschaal is geen van beide routes winstgevend. Maar wie opschaalt naar een industriële installatie van ongeveer 68.500 kubieke meter per uur, ziet de cryogene kost dalen naar tussen 213 en 220 euro per ton. Dat ligt onder de verkoopprijs van 260 euro per ton die ik veronderstelde, bijvoorbeeld voor toepassingen in de tuinbouw. Bij calciumlooping blijft de kost rond 280 euro per ton hangen, omdat de elektrische oven nauwelijks goedkoper wordt naarmate de installatie groter wordt.

 

Daar komt de waterstof bij: de ongeveer 70 ton per jaar die H2Loop oplevert, is goed voor circa 0,28 miljoen euro extra inkomsten per jaar. Aminewassing blijft met 100 tot 115 euro per ton wel goedkoper, omdat het goedkope stoom gebruikt in plaats van dure stroom.

 

De stroomprijs en de schaal bepalen dus het meest of een route haalbaar is, veel meer dan de investeringskost of de financiering. Voor dit soort geconcentreerd gas is cryogene scheiding daarom de aanbevolen keuze. Calciumlooping blijft op lange termijn interessant, maar enkel met een andere verwarming van de oven en een nuttige toepassing voor de vrijkomende hitte, bijvoorbeeld in samenwerking met een cementfabriek.

 

Wat ik niet kon bewijzen

 

Een simulatie is geen fabriek, en dat wil ik eerlijk zeggen. De modellen gaan uit van evenwicht, terwijl een echte installatie in cycli werkt. Voor ijzeroxide bestaat bovendien geen model dat het gedrag volledig juist beschrijft. Daarom geef ik mijn resultaten als een bandbreedte, met een optimistische bovengrens en een voorzichtigere ondergrens. In beide gevallen blijft de rangorde van de twee routes dezelfde.

 

Er is nog een aandachtspunt. Bij de lage temperaturen in de cryogene kolom kan CO₂ bevriezen. Een systeem dat dat voorkomt, zit nog niet in mijn kostenraming en moet nog worden ontworpen. Ook zijn proefinstallaties nodig om de resultaten te bevestigen.

 

Staal is onmisbaar en moeilijk te vervangen, dus elke euro die we besparen op afvang telt. Wat ik wel meeneem, is een les: er bestaat geen beste afvangtechniek. De juiste keuze hangt af van het gas dat je krijgt en van de stroom die je kunt betalen. Wie staal wil verduurzamen, doet er goed aan eerst het gas te concentreren, voor het gefilterd wordt. Dat is de kern van mijn onderzoek.

Bibliografie

[1] IEA, "Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector," Paris, France, 2021. Accessed: Apr. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
[2] IPCC, Ed. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, U.K. and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021.
[3] "Paris Agreement," United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris, France, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_ publication.pdf
[4] Emissions Gap Report 2025: Off Target - Continued Collective inaction puts Global Temperature Goal at Risk. United Nations Environment Programme, 2025. [Online]. Available: https:// www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2025
[5] P. Friedlingstein et al., "Global Carbon Budget 2025," pp. 1–139, 2025. doi: 10.5194/essd-2025-659. [Online]. Available: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2025-659/essd-2025-659.pdf
[6] IEA, "Global Energy Review 2025," International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2025.
[7] World Steel Association, "Sustainable Steel: At the Core of a Green Economy," 2012.
[8] World Steel Association, "World Steel in Figures," Brussels, Belgium, 2025. Accessed: Mar. 11, 2026.
[9] World Steel Association, "Sustainability Indicators Report 2025: Sustainability performance of the steel industry," World Steel Association, Brussels, Belgium, 2025.
[10] A. Grigsby-Schulte, H. Khadeeja, C. Swalec, R. Almada, Z. Zhang, and J. Zhi, "Pedal to the Metal 2025: Evaluating Progress Toward 2030 Iron and Steel Decarbonization Goals," 2025.
[11] IEA, "Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap - Towards more sustainable steelmaking," International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2020.
[12] A. Hasanbeigi and C. Springer, "How clean is the U.S. steel industry? An international benchmarking of energy and CO₂ intensities," San Francisco CA, 2019.
[13] V. Vogl, O. Olsson, and B. Nykvist, "Phasing out the blast furnace to meet global climate targets," Joule, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 2646–2662, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.09.007.
[14] J. Adánez, A. Abad, T. Mendiara, P. Gayán, L. F. de Diego, and F. García-Labiano, "Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels," Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 65, pp. 6– 66, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.005.
[15] M. Rao et al., "Chemical looping combustion of blast furnace gas from the iron and steel industry," Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 121, p. 102092, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2025.102092.
[16] J. Pei, J. Chen, J. Wang, Z. Li, N. Li, and J. Kan, "CO₂ capture technology based on gas hydrate method: A review," Frontiers in Chemistry, vol. 12, 2024, Art. no. 1448881, doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1448881.
[17] M. Bui et al., "Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward," Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1062–1176, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C7EE02342A.
[18] W. Sun, Q. Wang, Y. Zhou, and J. Wu, "Material and energy flows of the iron and steel industry: Status quo, challenges and perspectives," Applied Energy, vol. 268, p. 114946, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114946.
[19] M. Geerdes et al., Modern Blast Furnace Ironmaking an introduction, 4th ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press, 2020. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[20] H. Kildahl, L. Wang, L. Tong, and Y. Ding, "Cost effective decarbonisation of blast furnace – basic oxygen furnace steel production through thermochemical sector coupling," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 389, p. 135963, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135963.
[21] S. Shanthi Priya, BF gas utilization and power generation in steel plant using TRT. IEEE, 2009.
[22] C. Lanzerstorfer, W. Preitschopf, R. Neuhold, and C. Feilmayr, "Emissions and Removal of Gaseous Pollutants from the Top-gas of a Blast Furnace," ISIJ International, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 590–595, 2019, doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2018-591.
[23] E. A. Mousa, M. Bahgat, and A. A. El-Geassy, "Reduction of iron oxide compacts with simulated blast furnace top and shaft gases to mitigate CO₂ emissions," Ironmaking & Steelmaking, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 452–459, 2013, doi: 10.1179/1743281212Y.0000000075.
[24] H. Chen, Y. Wang, L. Yan, Z. Wang, B. He, and B. Fang, "Energy and Exergy Analysis on a Blast Furnace Gas-Driven Cascade Power Cycle," Energies, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 8078, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15218078.
[25] J. Stubbles, "Energy use in the U.S. steel industry: An historical perspective and future opportunities," Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
[26] Q. Zhang, Y. Tang, and L. Wang, "Numerical Simulation Study on the Thermal Efficiency of Hot Blast Stoves," Processes, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 559, 2024, doi: 10.3390/pr12030559.
[27] Y.-F. Gan, J.-Y. Jang, and T.-Y. Wu, "3D dynamic thermal and thermomechanical stress analysis of a hot blast stove," Ironmaking & Steelmaking, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 959–972, 2020, doi: 10.1080/03019233.2019.1647384.
[28] J. Seaman, "Recovery Act: ArcelorMittal USA Blast Furnace Gas Flare Capture," Chicago, IL, USA, 2013, doi: 10.2172/1082429.
[29] D. J. Mariños Rosado, S. B. Rojas Chávez, J. Amaro Gutierrez, F. H. Mayworm de Araújo, J. A. de Carvalho, and A. Z. Mendiburu, "Energetic analysis of reheating furnaces in the combustion of coke oven gas, Linz-Donawitz gas and blast furnace gas in the steel industry," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 169, p. 114905, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.114905.
[30] D. Pugh, A. Giles, A. Hopkins, T. O'Doherty, A. Griffiths, and R. Marsh, "Thermal distributive blast furnace gas characterisation, a steelworks case study," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 358–365, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.05.014.
[31] Materials Processing Institute, "Blast Furnace 2030 - A Vision for Sustainable Iron Production," 2017.
[32] thyssenkrupp AG, "Annual Report 2017/2018," thyssenkrupp AG, Essen, Germany, 2018.
[33] J. van der Stel, G. Louwerse, D. Sert, A. Hirsch, N. Eklund, and M. Pettersson, "Top gas recycling blast furnace developments for ‘green’ and sustainable ironmaking," Ironmaking & Steelmaking, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 483–489, 2013, doi: 10.1179/0301923313Z.000000000221.
[34] W. Zhang, J. Dai, C. Li, X. Yu, Z. Xue, and H. Saxén, "A Review on Explorations of the Oxygen Blast Furnace Process," steel research int., vol. 92, no. 1, 2021, Art. no. 2000326, doi: 10.1002/srin.202000326.
[35] C. Yilmaz, J. Wendelstorf, and T. Turek, "Modeling and simulation of hydrogen injection into a blast furnace to reduce carbon dioxide emissions," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 154, pp. 488–501, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.162.
[36] A. Lyngfelt, "Chemical Looping Combustion: Status and Development Challenges," Energy Fuels, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 9077–9093, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01454.
[37] J. R. Fernandez et al., "Decarbonization of Blast Furnace Gases Using a Packed Bed of Ca-Cu Solids in a New TRL7 Pilot," Energies, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 675, 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18030675.
[38] S. Daneshmand-Jahromi, M. H. Sedghkerdar, and N. Mahinpey, "A review of chemical looping combustion technology: Fundamentals, and development of natural, industrial waste, and synthetic oxygen carriers," Fuel, vol. 341, p. 127626, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127626. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[39] H. Zheng, X. Jiang, Y. Gao, A. Tong, and L. Zeng, "Chemical looping reforming: process fundamentals and oxygen carriers," Discov Chem Eng, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43938-022-00012-3.
[40] Y. Kim, H. S. Kim, H. Kim, J. Ha, D. Kang, and J. W. Lee, "Recent Strategies of Oxygen Carrier Design in Chemical Looping Processes for Inherent CO2 Capture and Utilization," Korean J. Chem. Eng., vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 3081–3100, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11814-024-00354-4.
[41] M. M. Hossain and H. I. de Lasa, "Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review," Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 63, no. 18, pp. 4433–4451, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.028.
[42] M. Osman, M. N. Khan, A. Zaabout, S. Cloete, and S. Amini, "Review of pressurized chemical looping processes for power generation and chemical production with integrated CO2 capture," Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 214, p. 106684, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106684.
[43] J. Adanez, A. Abad, F. Garcia-Labiano, P. Gayan, and L. F. de Diego, "Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies," Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 215–282, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001.
[44] E. Jerndal, T. Mattisson, and A. Lyngfelt, "Thermal Analysis of Chemical-Looping Combustion," Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 795–806, 2006, doi: 10.1205/cherd05020.
[45] Q. Imtiaz, D. Hosseini, and C. R. Müller, "Review of Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU): Thermodynamics, Material Development, and Synthesis," Energy Tech, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 633–647, 2013, doi: 10.1002/ente.201300099.
[46] P. Wang, N. Means, D. Shekhawat, D. Berry, and M. Massoudi, "Chemical-Looping Combustion and Gasification of Coals and Oxygen Carrier Development: A Brief Review," Energies, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 10605–10635, 2015, doi: 10.3390/en81010605.
[47] C. K. Clayton and K. J. Whitty, "Measurement and modeling of decomposition kinetics for copper oxide-based chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling," Applied Energy, vol. 116, pp. 416–423, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.032.
[48] I. Adánez-Rubio et al., "Chemical looping combustion of biomass: CLOU experiments with a Cu-Mn mixed oxide," Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 172, pp. 179–186, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.12.010.
[49] I. Adánez-Rubio, I. Samprón, M. T. Izquierdo, A. Abad, P. Gayán, and J. Adánez, "Coal and biomass combustion with CO2 capture by CLOU process using a magnetic Fe-Mn-supported CuO oxygen carrier," Fuel, vol. 314, p. 122742, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122742.
[50] C. Han et al., "Low-temperature CH₄ reforming and water splitting with activated NiO/CeO₂ as oxygen carrier," Nano-Micro Letters, vol. 18, no. 1, 2026, Art. no. 285, doi: 10.1007/s40820-026-02097-9.
[51] S. Cloete, A. Zaabout, and S. Amini, "The Internally Circulating Reactor (ICR) Concept Applied to Pressurized Chemical Looping Processes," Energy Procedia, vol. 114, pp. 446–457, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1187.
[52] P. Kolbitsch, T. Pröll, J. Bolhar-Nordenkampf, and H. Hofbauer, "Characterization of Chemical Looping Pilot Plant Performance via Experimental Determination of Solids Conversion," Energy Fuels, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1450–1455, 2009, doi: 10.1021/ef8008184.
[53] A. Cabello, B. Zornoza, T. Mendiara, A. Abad, and L. F. de Diego, "Versatile Low Cost Oxygen Carrier for Chemical Looping Processes Requiring Different Degree of Iron Oxide Reduction," Energy Fuels, vol. 38, no. 21, pp. 20707–20720, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02906.
[54] G. Voitic and V. Hacker, "Recent advancements in chemical looping water splitting for the production of hydrogen," RSC Adv., vol. 6, no. 100, pp. 98267–98296, 2016, doi: 10.1039/C6RA21180A. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[55] M. Damizia, M. P. Bracciale, F. Anania, L. Tai, P. de Filippis, and B. de Caprariis, "Efficient utilization of Al2O3 as structural promoter of Fe into 2 and 3 steps chemical looping hydrogen process: Pure H2 production from ethanol," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 99, pp. 39112–39123, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.067.
[56] S. Bock, R. Zacharias, and V. Hacker, "Experimental study on high-purity hydrogen generation from synthetic biogas in a 10 kW fixed-bed chemical looping system," RSC Advances, vol. 9, no. 41, pp. 23686–23695, 2019, doi: 10.1039/C9RA03123E.
[57] S. Noorman, M. van Sint Annaland, and J. A. M. Kuipers, "Packed Bed Reactor Technology for Chemical-Looping Combustion," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 4212–4220, 2007, doi: 10.1021/ie061178i.
[58] R. Zacharias, S. Visentin, S. Bock, and V. Hacker, "High-pressure hydrogen production with inherent sequestration of a pure carbon dioxide stream via fixed bed chemical looping," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 16, pp. 7943–7957, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.257.
[59] S. Bock, B. Stoppacher, K. Malli, M. Lammer, and V. Hacker, "Techno-economic analysis of fixed-bed chemical looping for decentralized, fuel-cell-grade hydrogen production coupled with a 3 MWth biogas digester," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 250, p. 114801, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114801.
[60] J. R. Fernández and J. C. Abanades, "Conceptual design of a Ni-based chemical looping combustion process using fixed-beds," Applied Energy, vol. 135, pp. 309–319, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.069.
[61] P. Cho, T. Mattisson, and A. Lyngfelt, "Comparison of iron-, nickel-, copper- and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion," Fuel, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 1215–1225, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.013.
[62] A. Lyngfelt, A. Brink, Ø. Langørgen, T. Mattisson, M. Rydén, and C. Linderholm, "11,000 h of chemical-looping combustion operation—Where are we and where do we want to go?," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 88, pp. 38–56, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.023.
[63] Q. Zafar, T. Mattisson, and B. Gevert, "Integrated hydrogen and power production with CO₂ capture using chemical-looping reforming: Redox reactivity of particles of CuO, Mn₂O₃, NiO, and Fe₂O₃ using SiO₂ as a support," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3485–3496, 2005, doi: 10.1021/ie048978i.
[64] Z. Yu et al., "Iron-based oxygen carriers in chemical looping conversions: A review," Carbon Resources Conversion, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.crcon.2018.11.004.
[65] L. Ilieva et al., "Mechanochemically Prepared Co3O4-CeO2 Catalysts for Complete Benzene Oxidation," Catalysts, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1316, 2021, doi: 10.3390/catal11111316.
[66] L. Zhao, B. Dou, H. Zhang, and Z. Wang, "Oxygen carriers for chemical-looping water splitting to hydrogen production: A critical review," Carbon Capture Science & Technology, vol. 1, p. 100006, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100006.
[67] X. Liu et al., "Research progress of oxygen carriers for the chemical looping process of different feedstocks," Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 190, p. 107393, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107393.
[68] K.-S. Kang et al., "Reduction and oxidation properties of Fe2O3/ZrO2 oxygen carrier for hydrogen production," Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 2584– 2597, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.04.001.
[69] N. S. Yüzbasi, A. Armutlulu, T. Huthwelker, P. M. Abdala, and C. R. Müller, "Na-β-Al₂O₃ stabilized Fe₂O₃ oxygen carriers for chemical looping water splitting: Correlating structure with redox Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions stability," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 10692–10700, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D1TA10507H.
[70] C.-T. Kao, C.-H. Shen, and H.-W. Hsu, "Feasibility Study of an Iron-Based Composite Added with Al2O3/ZrO2 as an Oxygen Carrier in the Chemical Looping Applications," Crystals, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 971, 2021, doi: 10.3390/cryst11080971.
[71] B. Gamisch, L. Huber, M. Gaderer, and B. Dawoud, "On the Kinetic Mechanisms of the Reduction and Oxidation Reactions of Iron Oxide/Iron Pellets for a Hydrogen Storage Process," Energies, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 8322, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15218322.
[72] J. Hu, V. V. Galvita, H. Poelman, and G. B. Marin, "Advanced Chemical Looping Materials for CO₂ Utilization: A Review," Materials (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 7, 2018, Art. no. 1187, doi: 10.3390/ma11071187.
[73] Z. Gao, D. Wu, M. Barakat, L. Sun, F. Gong, and R. Xiao, "Improving the reactivity and stability of Fe₂O₃/Al₂O₃ in chemical looping process by optimizing the Al₂O₃ precursor," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 3092–3103, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c04066.
[74] S. Ma, S. Chen, A. Soomro, and W. Xiang, "Effects of CeO₂, ZrO₂ and Al₂O₃ supports on iron oxygen carrier for chemical looping hydrogen generation," Energy Fuels, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 8001–8013, 2017, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01141.
[75] J. Göthel, K. J. Burkmann, and O. Volkova, "Review and Evaluation of Ceramic‐Stabilized Iron Oxides for Use as Energy Storage Based on Iron‐Steam Process," steel research int., vol. 96, no. 5, 2025, Art. no. 2400265, doi: 10.1002/srin.202400265.
[76] D. Spreitzer and J. Schenk, "Reduction of Iron Oxides with Hydrogen—A Review," steel research int., vol. 90, no. 10, 2019, Art. no. 1900108, doi: 10.1002/srin.201900108.
[77] T. F. A. Heidari, Optimizing Energy Consumption in Hydrogen Reduction of Iron Ore Pellet: Insights from HSC Chemistry Analysis. Linköping University Electronic Press, 2025.
[78] D. Wagner, O. Devisme, F. Patisson, and D. Ablitzer, "A laboratory study of the reduction of iron oxides by hydrogen," Sohn International Symposium, vol. 2, pp. 111–120, 2006.
[79] O. Yucel, F. Demirci, A. Turan, and M. Alkan, "Determination of Direct Reduction Conditions of Mill Scale," High Temperature Materials and Processes, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 405–412, 2013, doi: 10.1515/htmp-2012-0167.
[80] F. Patisson and O. Mirgaux, "Hydrogen Ironmaking: How It Works," Metals, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 922, 2020, doi: 10.3390/met10070922.
[81] M. L. Ali, Q. Fradet, and U. Riedel, "Kinetic Mechanism Development for the Direct Reduction of Single Hematite Pellets in H 2 /CO Atmospheres," steel research int., vol. 93, no. 12, 2022, Art. no. 2200043, doi: 10.1002/srin.202200043.
[82] F. Li et al., "Syngas Chemical Looping Gasification Process: Oxygen Carrier Particle Selection and Performance," Energy Fuels, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 4182–4189, 2009, doi: 10.1021/ef900236x.
[83] Global CCS Institute, "Global Status of CCS 2025," Global CCS Institute, Melbourne, Australia, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/ Global-Status-of-CCS-2025-report-9-October.pdf
[84] IEA, "CCUS projects around the world are reaching new milestones," International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/ccus-projects-around-the-world-are-rea…
[85] A. Diaz Vazquez et al., Clean Energy Technology Observatory: Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage in the European Union — Status Report on Technology Development, Trends, Value Chains and Markets 2024. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2024.
[86] Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, "Carbon capture for steel?," IEEFA, Valley City, OH, USA, 2024. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[87] IEA, "Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach - 2023 Update," IEA - International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2023.
[88] F. Raganati and P. Ammendola, "CO₂ post-combustion capture: A critical review of current technologies and future directions," Energy Fuels, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 13858–13905, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02513.
[89] S. Nagireddi, J. R. Agarwal, and D. Vedapuri, "Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects for Global Decarbonization," ACS Eng. Au, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–48, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00049.
[90] Z. Li, "Comparative Assessment of Post-Combustion and Pre-Combustion Carbon Capture Technologies," CHR, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 198–210, 2025, doi: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.LC26145.
[91] M. Strojny, P. Gładysz, D. P. Hanak, and W. Nowak, "Comparative analysis of CO2 capture technologies using amine absorption and calcium looping integrated with natural gas combined cycle power plant," Energy, vol. 284, p. 128599, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128599.
[92] S. U. R. Memon et al., "A Comprehensive Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS): Technological Advances, Environmental Impact, and Economic Feasibility," Sch Acad J Biosci, vol. 12, no. 07, pp. 184–204, 2024, doi: 10.36347/sajb.2024.v12i07.003.
[93] D. Leeson, P. Fennell, N. Shah, C. Petit, and N. M. Dowell, "A Techno-economic Analysis and Systematic Review of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Applied to the Iron and Steel, Cement, Oil Refining and Pulp and Paper Industries," Energy Procedia, vol. 114, pp. 6297–6302, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1766.
[94] W. Y. Hong, "A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO2 emissions future," Carbon Capture Science & Technology, vol. 3, p. 100044, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044.
[95] D. Obi, S. Onyekuru, and A. Orga, "Minimizing Carbon Capture Costs in Power Plants: A Novel Dimensional Analysis Framework for Techno‐Economic Evaluation of Oxyfuel Combustion, Pre‐ combustion, and Post‐combustion Capture Systems," Energy Science & Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1749–1770, 2025, doi: 10.1002/ese3.2089.
[96] N. Salem, K. K. Brar, A. Asgarian, K. Kaur, S. Magdouli, and N. N. Perreault, "Advancements in Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS): A Comprehensive Review of Technologies and Prospects," Clean Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, p. 109, 2025, doi: 10.3390/cleantechnol7040109.
[97] S. Talei, D. Fozer, P. S. Varbanov, A. Szanyi, and P. Mizsey, "Oxyfuel combustion makes carbon capture more efficient," ACS omega, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3250–3261, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05034.
[98] IEA. "Is carbon capture too expensive?" Accessed: Apr. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https:// www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive
[99] T. Mikunda, F. Neele, F. Wilschut and M. Hanegraaf, "A secure and affordable CO₂ supply for the Dutch greenhouse sector," Utrecht, The Netherlands, Rep. 060.14131, 2015.
[100] A. Naseeb, A. Ramadan, and S. M. Al-Salem, "Economic feasibility study of a carbon capture and storage (CCS) integration project in an oil-driven economy: The case of the State of Kuwait," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 11, 2022, Art. no. 6490, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116490.
[101] E. de Visser et al., "Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 478–484, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006.
[102] Carbon Dioxide Capture, Transportation and Geological Storage - Pipeline Transportation Systems, ISO 27913:2024, ISO, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/ #iso:std:84840:en Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[103] M. A. Leon Flöer, L. Podehl, and A. Weyand, "CO2-infrastructure regulation," Berlin, Germany, 2025.
[104] S. B. Martynov, N. K. Daud, H. Mahgerefteh, S. Brown, and R. Porter, "Impact of stream impurities on compressor power requirements for CO2 pipeline transportation," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 54, pp. 652–661, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.010.
[105] F. Okoro, A. Chapoy, P. Ahmadi, and R. Burgass, "Effects of non-condensable CCUS impurities (CH₄, O₂, Ar and N₂) on the saturation properties (bubble points) of CO₂-rich binary systems at low temperatures (228.15-273.15 K)," Greenhouse Gases, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 62–94, 2024, doi: 10.1002/ghg.2252.
[106] A. Choubineh, A. Helalizadeh, and D. A. Wood, "The impacts of gas impurities on the minimum miscibility pressure of injected CO2-rich gas–crude oil systems and enhanced oil recovery potential," Pet. Sci., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 117–126, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12182-018-0256-8.
[107] L. Marques, M. Monteiro, C. Cenci, M. Mateus, and J. Condeço, "Review of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture in Europe: Current Technologies and Future Strategies for Largest CO2-Emitting Industries," Energies, vol. 18, no. 13, p. 3539, 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18133539.
[108] G. Lu, Z. Wang, U. H. Bhatti, and X. Fan, "Recent progress in carbon dioxide capture technologies: A review," CEST, vol. 1, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.18686/cest.v1i1.32.
[109] M. P. S. Santos and D. P. Hanak, "Carbon capture for decarbonisation of energy-intensive industries: a comparative review of techno-economic feasibility of solid looping cycles," Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1291–1317, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11705-022-2151-5.
[110] T. M. Thiedemann and M. Wark, "A Compact Review of Current Technologies for Carbon Capture as Well as Storing and Utilizing the Captured CO2," Processes, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 283, 2025, doi: 10.3390/pr13010283.
[111] D. Y. Leung, G. Caramanna, and M. M. Maroto-Valer, "An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 39, pp. 426–443, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093.
[112] A. G. Olabi et al., "Prospect of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Technology and Its Impact on the Circular Economy," Energies, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 8639, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15228639.
[113] W. Jiang, Y. Lin, C. Sun, Y. Sun, and Y. Zhu, "Comparative review for enhancing CO₂ capture efficiency with mixed amine systems and catalysts," Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 29, no. 19, 2024, Art. no. 4618, doi: 10.3390/molecules29194618.
[114] J. Hack, N. Maeda, and D. M. Meier, "Review on CO₂ capture using amine-functionalized materials," ACS omega, vol. 7, no. 44, pp. 39520–39530, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03385.
[115] C. Gouedard, D. Picq, F. Launay, and P.-L. Carrette, "Amine degradation in CO2 capture. I. A review," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 10, pp. 244–270, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.015.
[116] A. Padurean, C.-C. Cormos, and P.-S. Agachi, "Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas– liquid absorption for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plants," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 7, pp. 1–11, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.007.
[117] Z. Kapetaki, P. Brandani, S. Brandani, and H. Ahn, "Process simulation of a dual-stage Selexol process for 95% carbon capture efficiency at an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 39, pp. 17–26, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.015.
[118] S. Roussanaly et al., "Techno-economic comparison of three technologies for pre-combustion CO2 capture from a lignite-fired IGCC," Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 436–452, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11705-019-1870-8. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[119] P. Xiao, J. Zhang, P. Webley, G. Li, R. Singh, and R. Todd, "Capture of CO₂ from flue gas streams with zeolite 13X by vacuum-pressure swing adsorption," Adsorption, vol. 14, 4-5, pp. 575–582, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10450-008-9128-7.
[120] H. Zentou et al., "Recent advances and challenges in solid sorbents for CO2 capture," Carbon Capture Science & Technology, vol. 15, p. 100386, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100386.
[121] H. Yang, S. Fan, X. Lang, Y. Wang, and J. Nie, "Economic comparison of three gas separation technologies for CO₂ capture from power plant flue gas," Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 615–620, 2011, doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60031-1.
[122] S. Mudhulu, J. Nath, B. V. R. Kuncharam, and S. Gupta, "High-throughput computational screening of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 selective separations: trends, challenges, and future perspectives," Chemical Engineering Journal: Green and Sustainable, vol. 1, p. 100025, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.cejgas.2026.100025.
[123] M. Karimi, A. Ferreira, A. E. Rodrigues, F. Nouar, C. Serre, and J. A. C. Silva, "MIL-160(Al) as a Candidate for Biogas Upgrading and CO₂ Capture by Adsorption Processes," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 5216–5229, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04150.
[124] Z. Tong and A. K. Sekizkardes, "Recent developments in high-performance membranes for CO₂ separation," Membranes, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, Art. no. 156, doi: 10.3390/membranes11020156.
[125] U.S. Department of Energy. "New membrane technology for post-combustion carbon capture begins pilot-scale test." [Online]. Available: https://www.energy.gov/hgeo/articles/new-membrane-technology-post-combu…
[126] R. W. Baker, "The design of membrane gas separation systems," Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 737, p. 124758, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124758.
[127] Á. A. Ramírez-Santos, M. Bozorg, B. Addis, V. Piccialli, C. Castel, and E. Favre, "Optimization of multistage membrane gas separation processes. Example of application to CO2 capture from blast furnace gas," Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 566, pp. 346–366, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.024.
[128] C. Astorino, E. de Nardo, S. Lettieri, G. Ferraro, C. F. Pirri, and S. Bocchini, "Advancements in gas separation for energy applications: Exploring the potential of polymer membranes with intrinsic microporosity (PIM)," Membranes, vol. 13, no. 12, 2023, Art. no. 903, doi: 10.3390/membranes13120903.
[129] S. Li, Y. Liu, D. A. Wong, and J. Yang, "Recent Advances in Polymer-Inorganic Mixed Matrix Membranes for CO2 Separation," Polymers, vol. 13, no. 15, 2021, Art. no. 2539, doi: 10.3390/polym13152539.
[130] E. Karatas, S. A. Al-Mutwalli, M. N. Taher, M. M. A. Shirazi, and D. Y. Koseoglu-Imer, "Reusability of Discarded Tubular Ceramic Membranes for CO2 Removal: A Case Study for Membrane Circularity," ACS omega, vol. 8, no. 32, pp. 29225–29233, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02568.
[131] S. Afzal and A. Khan, "Recent Advances in Molten-Carbonate Membranes for Carbon Dioxide Separation: Focus on Material Selection, Geometry, and Surface Modification," The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2021, 2021, Art. no. 1876875, doi: 10.1155/2021/1876875.
[132] H. Ochiai, K. Nagai, and H. Kaneko, "Machine Learning-Driven Design of Sustainable Polymer Membranes: Integrated Prediction of Gas Permeability, Selectivity, and Biodegradability," ACS omega, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1935–1944, 2025, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c10251.
[133] M. Luberti, E. Ballini, and M. Capocelli, "Unveiling the Potential of Cryogenic Post-Combustion Carbon Capture: From Fundamentals to Innovative Processes," Energies, vol. 17, no. 11, p. 2673, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17112673. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[134] A. M. Aneesh and A. A. Sam, "A mini-review on cryogenic carbon capture technology by desublimation: theoretical and modeling aspects," Front. Energy Res., vol. 11, 2023, Art. no. 1167099, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1167099.
[135] H. Asgharian et al., "The role of cryogenic carbon capture in future carbon-neutral societies," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 135, p. 104161, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104161.
[136] R. Wanison et al., "A review of cryogenic carbon capture research: Experimental studies, simulations, and application potential," Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 61, p. 103562, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103562.
[137] H. C. Mantripragada and E. S. Rubin, "Calcium Looping Cycle for CO2 Capture: Performance, Cost And Feasibility Analysis," Energy Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 2199–2206, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.239.
[138] B. Arias, Y. Alvarez Criado, A. Méndez, P. Marqués, I. Finca, and J. C. Abanades, "Pilot Testing of Calcium Looping at TRL7 with CO2 Capture Efficiencies toward 99," Energy & Fuels, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 14757–14764, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02472.
[139] D. Lai et al., "Process simulation and techno-economic analysis of CO2 capture by coupling calcium looping with concentrated solar power in coal-fired power plant," Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 358, p. 130228, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130228.
[140] M. Greco-Coppi et al., "Techno-economic assessment of carbonate looping for cost-effective CO2 capture in waste incineration," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 149, p. 104558, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104558.
[141] J. Sitarz, M. Pahle, S. Osorio, G. Luderer, and R. Pietzcker, "EU carbon prices signal high policy credibility and farsighted actors," Nat Energy, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 691–702, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41560-024-01505-x.
[142] Z. Wang et al., "Enhancement Strategies of Calcium Looping Technology and CaO-Based Sorbents for Carbon Capture," Small, vol. 21, no. 13, 2025, Art. no. 2412463, doi: 10.1002/smll.202412463.
[143] B. Arias et al., "Operating Experience in la Pereda 1.7 MWth Calcium Looping Pilot," Energy Procedia, vol. 114, pp. 149–157, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1157.
[144] B. Dziejarski, J. Serafin, K. Andersson, and R. Krzyżyńska, "CO2 capture materials: a review of current trends and future challenges," Materials Today Sustainability, vol. 24, p. 100483, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100483.
[145] M. Voldsund et al., "Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production— Part 1: Technical Evaluation," Energies, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 559, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12030559.
[146] M. Haaf, R. Anantharaman, S. Roussanaly, J. Ströhle, and B. Epple, "CO2 capture from waste-to-energy plants: Techno-economic assessment of novel integration concepts of calcium looping technology," Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 162, p. 104973, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104973.
[147] M. Jasper, A. Shahbazi, K. Schimmel, F. Li, and L. Wang, "Aspen Plus simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion of syngas and methane in fluidized beds," Discov Chem Eng, vol. 3, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43938-023-00020-x.
[148] N. Y., R. K. Sahoo, M. S., and S. Gu, "4E analysis of the cryogenic CO2 separation process integrated with waste heat recovery," Energy, vol. 278, p. 127922, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127922.
[149] Y. A. Criado, R. García, and J. Carlos Abanades, "Demonstration of CO2 capture with CaO and Ca(OH)2 in a countercurrent moving bed carbonator pilot," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 494, p. 152945, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.152945. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[150] A. Abad, "Chemical looping for hydrogen production," in Calcium and Chemical Looping Technology for Power Generation and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 327– 374.
[151] E. C. Carlson, "Don’t Gamble With Physical Properties For Simulations," Chemical Engineering Progress, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 35–46, 1996.
[152] T. Papalas, D. Lypiridis, A. N. Antzaras, and A. A. Lemonidou, "Experimental investigation of integrated CO2 capture and conversion to syngas via calcium looping coupled with dry reforming of CH4," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 485, p. 149866, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.149866.
[153] Ö. Ç. Mutlu and T. Zeng, "Challenges and Opportunities of Modeling Biomass Gasification in Aspen Plus: A Review," Chem Eng & Technol, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1674–1689, 2020, doi: 10.1002/ceat.202000068.
[154] R. Remus, M. A. Aguado-Monsonet, S. Roudier, and L. Delgado Sancho, "Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for iron and steel production: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU - Integrated pollution prevention and control," Europäische Kommission, Luxembourg, Rep. JRC 69967, 2013, doi: 10.2791/97469. [Online]. Available: http:// bookshop.europa.eu/en/best-available-techniques-bat-reference-document-for-iron-and-steel-production-pbLFNA25521/
[155] L. Chen et al., "Effect of carbon deposition on the chemical looping hydrogen generation with iron-based oxygen carriers," Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 314, p. 121834, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2025.121834.
[156] H. Bahzad, K. Katayama, M. E. Boot-Handford, N. Mac Dowell, N. Shah, and P. S. Fennell, "Iron-based chemical-looping technology for decarbonising iron and steel production," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 91, p. 102766, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.06.017.
[157] C. Chung, L. Qin, V. Shah, and L.-S. Fan, "Chemically and physically robust, commercially-viable iron-based composite oxygen carriers sustainable over 3000 redox cycles at high temperatures for chemical looping applications," Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2318– 2323, 2017, doi: 10.1039/C7EE02657A.
[158] D. W. Breck, Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry, and Use, 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
[159] J. Kemper, L. Sutherland, J. Watt, and S. Santos, "Evaluation and analysis of the performance of dehydration units for CO₂ capture," Energy Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 7568–7584, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.792.
[160] E. Okafor, S. Shehu, I. Ikechukwu, O. Darlington, and O. Itua, "Techno-economic evaluation of a molecular sieve-based dehydration unit," The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 111–119, 2024.
[161] G. Towler and R. Sinnott, Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.
[162] S. Mokhatab, J. Y. Mak, J. V. Valappil, and D. A. Wood, "Process control and automation of LNG plants and import terminals: in Handbook of Liquefied Natural Gas, Oxford, UK," pp. 259–296.
[163] W. L. Luyben, "Estimating refrigeration costs at cryogenic temperatures," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 103, pp. 144–150, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.03.013.
[164] R. Span and W. Wagner, "A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple-Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa," Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1509–1596, 1996, doi: 10.1063/1.555991. Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[165] D.-Y. Peng and D. B. Robinson, "A New Two-Constant Equation of State," Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 1976, doi: 10.1021/i160057a011.
[166] M. R. Fenske, "Fractionation of Straight-Run Pennsylvania Gasoline," Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 482–485, 1932, doi: 10.1021/ie50269a003.
[167] J. M. Douglas, Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
[168] D. Clodic and M. Younes, "A new method for CO₂ capture: Frosting CO₂ at atmospheric pressure," Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies — 6th Int. Conf. (GHGT-6), pp. 155–160, 2003.
[169] B. R. Stanmore and P. Gilot, "Review—calcination and carbonation of limestone during thermal cycling for CO2 sequestration," Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 86, no. 16, pp. 1707–1743, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.023.
[170] J. P. Rincon Duarte et al., "Solar calcium looping cycle for CO2 capturing in a cement plant. Definition of process parameters and reactors selection," Solar Energy, vol. 238, pp. 189–202, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.04.031.
[171] W. Dai, S. Banerjee, and R. K. Agarwal, "Comparison of energy penalty in post-combustion and pre-combustion calcium looping systems using Aspen Plus," International Journal of Energy and Environment, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 2017.
[172] Z. Li, N. Cai, Y. Huang, and H. Han, "Synthesis, Experimental Studies, and Analysis of a New Calcium-Based Carbon Dioxide Absorbent," Energy Fuels, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1447–1452, 2005, doi: 10.1021/ef0496799.
[173] V. Manovic and E. J. Anthony, "CaO-based pellets supported by calcium aluminate cements for high-temperature CO2 capture," Environmental science & technology, vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 7117– 7122, 2009, doi: 10.1021/es901258w.
[174] G. S. Grasa and J. C. Abanades, "CO₂ Capture Capacity of CaO in Long Series of Carbonation/Calcination Cycles," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 45, no. 26, pp. 8846–8851, 2006, doi: 10.1021/ie0606946.
[175] J. R. Fernandez, M. Alonso, R. Garcia, A. Mendez, M. Cano, and C. Abanades, "Pilot-scale demonstration of Ca–Cu looping for CO₂ capture from blast furnace gas," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 533, p. 174685, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2026.174685.
[176] J. R. Fernández, A. Barragán, and J. C. Abanades, "CO₂ Capture System by Calcium Looping with Steam-Enhanced Calcination," Energy Fuels, vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 8161–8172, 2026, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c06237.
[177] V. Manovic and E. J. Anthony, "Steam reactivation of spent CaO-based sorbent for multiple CO2 capture cycles," Environmental science & technology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1420–1425, 2007, doi: 10.1021/es0621344.
[178] B. V. Materić, C. Sheppard, and S. I. Smedley, "Effect of repeated steam hydration reactivation on CaO-based sorbents for CO₂ capture," Environmental science & technology, vol. 44, no. 24, pp. 9496–9501, 2010, doi: 10.1021/es102623k.
[179] A. W. Zimmermann et al., "Techno-Economic Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization," Front. Energy Res., vol. 8, 2020, Art. no. 5, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00005.
[180] AACE International, "Cost estimate classification system-As applied in engineering, procurement, and construction for the process industries," Morgantown, WV, USA, Rep. 18R-97, 2005.
[181] Tax Foundation. "Corporate Income Tax Rates in Europe." Accessed: May 5, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/eu/corporate-tax-rates-europe-2024/ Gunel Rahimli Optimization and Future Directions
[182] European Central Bank. "The ECB's monetary policy strategy statement." [Online]. Available: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/strategy/pricestab/html/index.en.html
[183] Bundesministerium der Finanzen, "AfA-Tabelle für den Wirtschaftszweig Chemische Industrie," BMF, Berlin, Germany, 2025. Accessed: Jun. 26, 2026. [Online]. Available: https:// www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Datenportal/Daten/offene-daten/steuern-z… datensaetze/AfA-Tabellen_kumuliert_csv.csv?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
[184] M. S. Peters, K. D. Timmerhaus, and R. E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
[185] N. Khallaghi, S. Ahmed, M. Malekshahian, and V. Spallina, Preliminary Techno-Economic Evaluation of Blast Furnace Gas Utilisation with Ca-Cu looping Cycle Integrated with CO₂ Separation by Partial Condensation, 2022.

Download scriptie (7.24 MB)
Universiteit of Hogeschool
Universiteit Gent
Thesis jaar
2026
Promotor(en) en begeleiders
Gero Frisch, Julien Göthel