Precariteit in de Muziekindustrie

Wim Boddin
Wat is precariteit en wat voor effect heeft het op de muziekindustrie? Aan de hand van een kwalitatieve analyse van zeven ondervraagde muzikanten wordt er gezocht naar problemen en mogelijke oplossingen met betrekking tot precariteit. De conclusie is dat het nog niet te laat is om de belangen van de muzikant te verdedigen en de precariteit weg te werken.

Precarity in the Music Industry

The title of this thesis immediately raises two main questions. What is precarity exactly and how does it affect the music industry? Firstly, the methods of the qualitative research are explained, with an introduction of the seven interviewees (Lotte Leemans, Koen Lamberechts, Michael Bauwens, Linde Verjans, Jeroen Vanbever, Chantal Acda and Tom Kestens). Secondly, some important empirical and qualitative studies about the welfare and economic status of musicians will be discussed, with extra stress on ‘some’, since there aren’t that many studies about the music industry, let alone the well-being and job-insecurity of artists. Precarity is a condition of existence without predictability, stability or security. The term is used in a negative context as well as in a positive one, although the latter situation occurs less than the former. Ongoing critics and discussion in debates concerning the growing precarity is preceded by the explanation of derivations like precariat and precariousness.

After the theoretical part of the thesis, it’s time for the case studies where the research is illustrated by observations and conclusions alternated by quotes and paraphrases. Every professional musician has his own unique experience and perspective which, once compared and combined, makes for various mixed cocktails of contradictions and similarities. The analysis is structured around three main topics: the current situation of the artist in the music industry, the problems in this industry and the possible solutions for it. It is discovered that there is a chain of reactions, starting with the digitalization of the modern world. This digitalization causes an oversupply of unexperienced musicians, which causes in its turn uncertainty and forced flexibility among artists, who take everything they can get, even if it’s for free. The artist is the source of music and he should be put in the (digital) spotlights, instead of being manipulated by labels, agencies or online platforms. Luckily, besides listing causes of precarity, the interviewees came up with a variety of solutions for the precarity in the music industry. The musicians themselves, as well as the music industry, the society and the state can help to solve the precarity amongst artists. Musicians should fight for their rights instead of getting down on their knees and pray (figuratively). Society blindly follows the opinions of music experts (without stress on expert most of the time) and social media which is not ideal. The influence of the internet positively increases promo and publicity but people should be more critical. Organizations like Poppunt, Kunstenloket and GALM should keep striving for better conditions for the artist. SABAM helps the creating artists to be paid for the use of their songs. The state should rethink their strategies with regard to subsidies. The worst they can do is lower the subsidies for the arts even more to lower the state’s budget deficit. An interesting discussion about a basic income for everyone and whether or not this has a positive effect on the music industry is a last solution to precarity. While this still sounds utopic and unrealistic, it’s already being tested in some countries (Netherlands and Finland). It’s safe to say that all is not lost. The music industry is a precarious industry but this precarity can be decreased in several ways through the contribution of the state, the society’s perspective, the music industry and the musicians themselves.


Abbing, H. (2011). Social Value of Art. A Sociological Study of Art, Artists and the Arts Economy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Abbing, H. (2002). Why are Artists Poor: The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Alper, N. O. & Wassall, G. H. (2006). ‘Artists' Careers and Their Labor Market’, in Ginsburgh, V. A. & Throsby, D. (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Arends, S. & Verbeke, K. (2017). ‘Freelancers: in feite buiten ze zichzelf uit’, in Apache.

Beck, U. (2000).The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press.

Berardi, F. (2005). ‘What Does Cognitariat Mean?. Work Desire and Depression’, in Cultural Studies Review, vol. 11, n. 2.: p. 57-63.

Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life. The Power of Mourning and Violence. Londen & New York: Verso.

Cappai, R. (2011, 29 mei). ‘Precarity in the Music Sector of the City of Belo Horizonte’. Geraadpleegd van…

Fantone, L. (2007). ‘Precarious Changes: Gender and Generational Politics in Contemporary Italy’, in Feminist Review, vol. 87: p. 5–20.

Filer, R. K. (1986). 'The `Starving Artist' - Myth or Reality? Earnings of Artists in the United States', in Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94: p. 56-75.

Frey, B. S. (1997). Not Just for the Money. An Economic Theory of Human Behaviour. Cheltenham (UK) & Brookfield (USA): Edward Elgar.

Frey, B. S. & Pommerehne, W. (1989). Muses and Markets. Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Ginsburgh, V. A. & Throsby, D. (eds.) (2014). Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Gill, R. & Pratt, A. (2013). ‘Precarity and Cultural Work in the Social Factory? Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work’, In The precarious labour in the field of art, vol. 16, n.13: p. 26-40.

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The Cultural Industries. Londen: Sage.

Hesters, D. (2017, 24 april). ‘Moeten we dan echt iedereen die zich kunstenaar noemt betalen?’ Geraadpleegd van…

Hillaert, W. & Viaene, T. (2011). 'De cultuursector moet zelf politiek worden' in Rekto Verso.

Horning, R. (2012). ‘Precarity and affective resistance’, in The New Inquiry.

‘Iedereen een basisinkomen’, in Canvas. (2017, 17 augustus). Geraadpleegd van

Kain, R. (2017, 18 mei). ‘Zo weinig vrouwen kwamen er afgelopen jaar op de Nederlandse radio’. Geraadpleegd van…

Kestens, T. (2016a). ‘Come together: staat van de muziek’, in Rekto Verso, n. 70.

Kestens, T. (2016b). ‘‘Flanders, state of the art’: handel ernaar’, in Rekto Verso, n. 70.

Keunen, G. (2015). Een eeuw popmuziek: van crooners tot dubstep. Tielt: Lannoo.

Kretsos, L. & Umney, C. (2015). ‘That’s the Experience: Passion, Work, Precarity, and Life Transitions among London Jazz Musicians’, in Work and Occupations.

Lunning, F. (2010). Mechademia 5: Fanthropologies. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Martin-Iverson, S. (2012). ‘Autonomous Youth? Independence and Precariousness in the Indonesian Underground Music Scene’, in The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, vol. 13, n. 4: p. 382–397.

McRobbie, A. (2002). ‘Clubs To Companies: Notes On The Decline Of Political Culture In Speeded Up Creative Worlds’, in Cultural Studies, vol. 16, n. 4: p. 516-31.

Menger, P. M. (2006). ‘Artistic Labor Markets: Contingent Work, Excess Supply and Occupational Risk Management’, in Ginsburgh, V. A. & Throsby, D. (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Neilson, B. & Rossiter, N. (2015). ‘From Precarity to Precariousness and Back Again: Labour, Life and Unstable Networks.’

Oudenampsen, M. & Sullivan, G. (2006). ‘Precarity and N/european Identity: (an Interview with Alex Foti (ChainWorkers))’, in Mute Magazine: p. 44-53.

Ploeg, F. v. d. (2005). ‘The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective’, in CESifo Working Paper, n. 1524.

Precarias a la Deriva. (2004). A la deriva por los circuitos de la precariedad feminina. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

Rengers, M. (2002). ‘Economic Lives of Artists. Studies into Careers and the Labour Market in the Cultural Sector. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.

Siongers, J., Van Steen, A. & Lievens, J. (2016). ‘Loont passie? Een onderzoek naar de sociaaleconomische positie van professionele kunstenaars in Vlaanderen.’

Solhjell, D. (2000), 'Poor Artists in a Welfare State: A Study in the Politics and Economics of Symbolic Rewards’, in International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 7, n. 2: p. 319-54.

Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat The New Dangerous Class. Londen: Bloomsbury Academic.

Throsby, D. (2011). ‘The Political Economy of Art: Ruskin and Contemporary Cultural Economics’, in History of Political Economy, vol. 43, n. 2: p.275.

Throsby, D. (2012). ‘Why Should Economists be Interested in Cultural Policy?’, in Economic Record, vol. 88, p. 106-109.

Towse, R. (ed.) (2011). A Handbook of Cultural Economics. Cheltenham: Elgar.

Van Looy, B. (2011, 21 december). ‘Cultuursubsidies zijn zo gek nog niet’. Geraadpleegd van

Vanni, I. & Tari, M. (2005). ‘The Life and Deed of San Precario, Patron Saints of Precarious Workers and Lives’, in The Fibreculture Journal, vol. 5.

Verbeylen, W. (2014). ‘Kunstenaars, subsidieslurpers?’, in Campuskrant KU Leuven, vol. 26, n. 3.

Victoria Deluxe. (2013, 25 februari). ‘Basisinkomen: een middel om armoede en werkloosheid te bestrijden’. Geraadpleegd van…

Vrasti, W. (2013). ‘Struggling with Precarity: From More and Better Jobs to Less and Lesser Work’, in The Disorder Of Things.

Vrijens, J. (2013). ‘Online streaming: De redding van de muziekindustrie?’

Wikstrom, P. (2006). ‘Reluctantly virtual : modelling copyright industry dynamics.’ Karlstad: Karlstad University.

Woodcock, J. (2014). ‘Precarious Workers in London: New Forms of Organisation and the City’, in City, vol. 18, n. 6: p. 776–788.

Universiteit of Hogeschool
Master in de Culturele Studies - Faculteit Letteren
Professor Anneleen Masschelein